VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S. Krishnan (Died), 1. Chandran, v. Issac (Died), Thangamani Alias Thavamani (Died), Krishnan (Died), 1. Chinnakutti,

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 November 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
CMP(MD) 10625/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI C.M.P.(MD)No.10625 of 2023 in Rev. Aplc(MD)SR.No.57812 of 2023 S. KRISHNAN (DIED)

1. CHANDRAN 2 VASANTHA DEVI, 3 KANAGARAJ, ...APPELLANTS/ PETITIONERS

Vs ISSAC (DIED), THANGAMANI ALI AS THAVAMANI (DIED), KRISHNAN (DIED),

¶1CHINNAKUTTI VALLIAMMAL(DIED) 2 MOOKAMMAL CHINNAGURUSAMY (DIED), CMP(MD)eNo.10625eofe2023 oCHELLATHAIo(DIED) 3oGNANAMMAL,ooooo 4oPAPPA,oooooooo oROOTHUo(DIED) 5oPAULSAMY oKARUPPASAMYo(DIED) 6oJANAKIAMMAL oBAKKIYAMo(DIED) 7oKANNIAMMAL 8oDARMARAANI 9oCHANDRAKALA, 10oMAHESWARI,o 11oBALASUNDARI,o 12oESWARI,ooooo 13oARUMUGAM,ooooo 14oKRISHNAN,ooooo 15oSELVI,oooooooo 16oREBACKAAL,ooooo 17oMAARI,oooo 18 KUMAR, 19 VASANTHA, 20 PUSHPA, 21 THAIAMMAL, 22 BUELA PREMASUNDARI, 23 PRABHUDOSS, 24 ISSAC KIRUBAKARAN, 25 VIJAYARANI, 26 PAULRAJ PANDIAN, 27 ELIZABETH RANI, ... RESPONDENTS/PETITONERS Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Condone the Delay of 139 days in preferring the Review Application and take it as and thus render justice. PRAYER IN

in Rev. Aplc(MD)SR.No.57812 of 2023

To review the Judgment and decree dated 27.10.2022, passed in SA(MD) No.403/2022, on the file of this Hon'ble Court and to allow this Review Application same and render Justice Prayer in SA(MD). 403/ 2022 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to allow the appeal by setting aside the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S. No. 64 of 2008 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi, dated 08.04.2022 confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 146 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Shenkottai dated 25.07.2008 and thus render justice. ORDER : This Civil Miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.F.X.EUGENE, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.T.S.R.VENKATRAMANA, Senior Counsel on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:- This petition is filed to condone the delay of 139 days in preferring this review application.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the papers got mixed up with other bundles and therefore, there was a delay in filing the review application.

¶3The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents strongly opposed to condone the delay that the reasons stated by the petitioner's counsel are not proper.

¶4Considering that it is a mistake happened in the office of the petitioner's counsel, this Court is inclined to allow this petition with costs of Rs.5,000/-.

¶5Accordingly, this petition is allowed with costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the credit of Current Account No. 7567821433, (IFSC Code: IDIBI000H040), in the Indian Bank, High Court Branch, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai, towards Kalaignar Centenary Library, payable by the petitioners within a period of two weeks.

sd/-

06/11/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

10/11/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. ogy TO

¶1THE ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, TENKASI,

2. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF, SHENKOTTAI COPY TO

1.THE REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL) MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

2.THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, KALAIGNAR CENTENARY LIBRARY, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.F.X.EUGENE, Advocate ( SR-16016[I] dated 07/11/2023 ) ORDER IN C.M.P.(MD)No.10625 of 2023 in Rev. Aplc(MD)SR.No.57812 of 2023 Date :06/11/2023 RK/JGB (09/11/2023) 6P / 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.