Anthony v. Aruthamary

JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellants filed a memo dated

01.03.2023 stating that the dispute in second appeal had been settled between the parties out of Court. Hence, he seeks to leave of the Court to withdraw this second appeal.

¶2Leave is granted and the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

03.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No cp To

1.The Sub Court, Pattukottai.

2.The District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu.

3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SOUNTHAR

, J.

CP S.A(MD)No.575 of 2015

03.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR S.A(MD)No.575 of 2015 1.Anthony 2.Arockiamary 3.Jeevarathinam Nesamani 3.Stella Glory ...Appellants -Vs- 1.Arupthamary 2.Victoria 3.Soosaimary Mary Stella 4.Arockiamary 5.Santhosam 6.Suvakkeen 7.Rani 8.Richard Raj 9.Vinoliya ... Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.1 of 2012 dated 11.12.2014 on the file of the Sub Court, Pattukottai, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.46 of 2003 dated 30.09.2010 on the file of the District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate, Orathanadu. For Appellants : Mr.R.Sundar Srinivasan For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Vijayakumar For R4 to R9 : No appearance