- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 August 2023
- Bench
- Anita Sumanth, R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WA(MD) 103/2015
Judgment
JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) An endorsement has been made by learned Counsel for the appellant duly supported by Mr.Arun Ramanathan, learned Counsel representing Counsel Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned Counsel for the appellant, to the effect that the Writ Appeal has been rendered infructuous.
2.Recording this, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. [A.S.M.J.,] & [R.V.J.,] NCC :Yes/No
04.08.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No cmr To
1.The Executive Officer, Vikramasingapuram Municipality, Vikramasingapuram, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai – 600 005.
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. cmr W.A.(MD)No.103 of 2015
04.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.A.(MD)No.103 of 2015 D.Amirtharaj Kani ...Appellant -Vs.- 1.The Executive Officer, Vikramasingapuram Municipality, Vikramasingapuram, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai – 600 005. ...Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Appeal - filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 10.09.2014 made in W.P.(MD)No.6187 of 2021 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.Arun Ramanathan for Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For R1 : Mr.H.Arumugam For R2 :Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate ****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.