- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 March 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 19852/2014
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
16.03.2023 NCC: Yes / No Index :Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No mbi To The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai
B.PUGALENDHI, J. mbi
16.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD)No.19852/2014 & MP(MD)No.1/2014 P.Arumugam ...Petitioner Vs The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings in Ma4Po5/005271/2013 dated 11.11.2014 of the respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiv Raj For Respondent : Mrs.Devasenai
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.