VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A. Sagayamadha v. The Distirct Collector

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 March 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20778/2014

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed questioning the auction notice issued for cutting and removing the seemai karuvelai trees.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner expressed his difficulty in getting instructions from the petitioner.

¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that this writ petition is only with regard to the auction notice, which was issued in the year 2014 and therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition for further consideration.

¶4Recording the submissions of the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

17.03.2023 NCC: Yes / No Index :Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No mbi

B.PUGALENDHI, J. mbi To

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Assistant Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collectorate, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Block Development Officer, Block Development Officer, RS.Mangalam, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

17.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD)No.20778/2014 & MP(MD)Nos.1 to 3/2014 A.Sagayamadha ...Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Assistant Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Collectorate, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Block Development Officer, RS.Mangalam, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the office of the fourth respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.Thi3/2346/2014 dated 27.11.2014 and its consequential proceedings and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to conduct the public auction for removing the babul trees, which are standing the village kanmoi comprising in RS.Mangalam Union in due process of law by properly fixing upset price. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Kannan For Respondent : Mr.J.K.Jayaselan, Government Advocate for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.