- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10635/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
28.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Trichy-1, Trichy District.
2.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Rivers Division, Trichy-1, Trichy District.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Rivers Division, Musiri, Trichy District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
28.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN T.Saroja ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Trichy-1, Trichy District. 2.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Rivers Division, Trichy-1, Trichy District. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Rivers Division, Musiri, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent herein to issue cutting orders pertaining to the eucalyptus trees situated at Trichy District, Musiri Taluk, Amoor Village, S.F.No.352, broad cauvery bond, in the light of petitioner's representation dated 04.06.2015 within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, Addl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.