- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 September 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20896/2014
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ petition will have to be allowed in view of the order dated 13.07.2023 made in W.P.
(MD)No.19501, 19457 to 19460 of 2014.
¶3However, the learned Special Government Pleader informs the Court that the petitioner has given in writing that since she had already sold the property, she does not want to pursue the matter.
¶4In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondents, the Writ Petition is closed. Liberty is given to the subsequent purchasers to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
29.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
29.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 R.Valarmathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the Respondents from interfering with the cultivation of the Petitioner's land in Survey No 6/2, Soorathurpatti, Uranganpatti Panchayar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhurajadurai For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhirajan Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.