- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 March 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20920/2014
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement so.
2.Permission is granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
30.03.2023 dsk To
1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The President, Puliyampatti Village Panchayat, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
30.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI P.Muruganantha Boopathy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The President, Puliyampatti Village Panchayat, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 28.06.2014 passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Nil and quash the same as illegal, consequently directing the 2nd respondent to grant approval to the building plan pertaining to Survey No.172/2b measuring about 1.40 acres at Puliyampatti Village, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District. For petitioner : Mr.T.Dhandapani For Respondent : Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.