- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21056/2014
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous. Nothing survives for further adjudication. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
04.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 S.Samuthiravel ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Sattur Municipality, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No. 308/2012 F1 dated 17.12.2014 issued by teh respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to give licence to the petitioenr to run a two wheeler cart stand in Survey NO. 54/3 at P.V.S complex, Old Trunk Road, Madurai Kanyakumari Highways in Sattur, Virudhunagar District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan For Respondent : Mr.M.Murali G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.