- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 March 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21235/2014
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed by the petitioner as against the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 14.08.2013, in and by which, the Revenue Divisional Officer has cancelled the patta stood in the name of the petitioner's vendor.
2.There is no representation for the petitioner.
3.Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent, on instructions, submitted that pending the proceedings before the revenue officials, the petitioner has filed a suit in O.S.No.84 of 2013 before the Sub Court, Kovilpatti, for the relief of declaration and injunction and the suit is adjourned to 11.04.2023 for evidence.
4.Considering the fact that the petitioner has already approached the competent civil Court, this writ petition stands disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the pending civil suit. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No
29.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No gk To The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk
29.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and MP(MD)No.1 of 2014 Edustar Foundation, Through its Chairman, Elangovan ... Petitioner v. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District. 2.Thangavel ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Pa.Mu.Aa6/5008/10 dated 14.08.2013 and quash the same. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader for R.1 Mr.T.Robert Chandrakumar for R.2 *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.