VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Pushpa v. Muthupandi

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 September 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 1642/2023

Judgment

ORDER I am satisfied that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. The Tahsildar, Madurai South, Madurai vide memorandum dated 31.08.2023 has informed that since the property purchased by him has been classified as water body in the revenue record, survey cannot be done. It is for the petitioner to question the said memorandum in the manner known to law.

¶2With this liberty to the petitioner, the contempt petition is closed.

08.09.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi To The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Collector Office, Madurai. Cont. P(MD)No.1642 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.1232 of 2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

Cont. P(MD)No.1642 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.1642 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.1232 of 2023 K.Pushpa ... Petitioner Vs. Muthupandi The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Collector Office, Madurai. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / 1st respondent herein for the act of contempt committed by the contemnor / 1st respondent for his willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1232 of 2023, dated 24.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.T.R.Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader Cont. P(MD)No.1642 of 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.