N. Asanmathar v. The Tamilnadu Electricity

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs this Court that she is unable to contact the writ petitioner.

¶3The learned Standing counsel submits that the petitioner has since sold the property. He would also state that the poles erected by TANGEDCO do not cause inconvenience to any person.

¶4Recording the stand of the respondents, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

15.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.11180 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.11180 of 2015

15.09.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.11180 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.11180 of 2015 N.Asanmathar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by its Chairman, Anna Salai, Chennai – 2. 2. The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, V.M.Sathiram(Town), Tirunelveli District. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Palayapettai (Distribution), Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 2 and 3 to remove the transformer, electric poles and service lines erected in front of the petitioner's land and direct respondents 2 and 3 herein to bear the costs of re-locating the transformer, electricity poles and service lines in Ayan survey No.30/2B situate at Sathuli Nagar, Vagaikulam Village within the Sub-Registration District of Tirunelveli. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.11180 OF 2015 For Petitioner : Ms.M.Benazir Begum For Respondents: Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel. * * *