- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 March 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21467/2014
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
17.03.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. To
¶1The Director, The Employees' State Corporation, Chennai.
¶2The Deputy Director (INSII) Authorized Officer, The Employees' State Corporation ESI Corporation, 2nd West Street, K.K.Nagar, Madurai – 625 020.
¶3The Recovery Officer, The Employees' State Corporation, ESI Corporation, 2nd West Street, K.K.Nagar, Madurai – 625 020.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
¶4The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Anna Nagar Branch, Madurai.
17.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 A.Meena ... Petitioner versus 1. The Director, The Employees' State Corporation, Chennai. 2. The Deputy Director (INSII) Authorized Officer, The Employees' State Corporation ESI Corporation, 2nd West Street, K.K.Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 3. The Recovery Officer, The Employees' State Corporation, ESI Corporation, 2nd West Street, K.K.Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 4. The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Anna Nagar Branch, Madurai. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the proceedings of the 3rd respondent made in No. 57/RRC/00/072356/000/1009/SRO/MDU/1808/13 dated 27.01.2014 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent to conduct the fresh enquiry for non-payment of premium during the year 01.07.2012 to 31.12.2012, 01.01.2013 to 31.12.2013 by giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner's company. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan For R1 to R3 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.