Mokkai @ Karuppadevar v. The Assistant Engineer

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner is an agriculturist. He is enjoying free electricity service connection. By the impugned communication, the petitioner has been informed that his connection will be cut off within 24 hours.

¶3It is true that the authorities appear to have informed the petitioner earlier and that the petitioner did not respond. However, taking note of the special facts and circumstances obtaining in this case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be given one more opportunity.

¶4In this view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside. Liberty is given to the respondent to proceed afresh on merits and in accordance with law. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

15.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.11677 OF 2015 To: The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chinnakatalai Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.11677 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.11677 of 2015

15.09.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.11677 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.11677 of 2015 AND M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 Mokkai @ Karuppadevar ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chinnakatalai Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Order dated 07.07.2015 in Ka.No.VuMiPo/Pa/Sika/Vavu/Ko.Kattu/A. No.171/15 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.11677 OF 2015