Mariajeyanthi v. The District Collector

ORDER The writ petition was listed on as many as five occasions. The petitioner was directed to produce the original assignment order.

2.Today ie., 26.09.2023 when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo for withdrawing his appearance. The direction given by this Court for production of the original document has not been complied with. Therefore, the writ petitioner is not entitled to prosecute the writ petition and the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

26.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

26.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Mariajeyanthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to receive the original copy of the free assignment allotted to the petitioner for the land in survey No.296-7, to extent of 0.36.5, Vellapatti Village, Keela Arasaradi, Ottapedaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District vide proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Ni.O.A2/450/02 dated 29.03.2002 and subsequently direct the 2nd respondent to incorporate the petitioner's name in village account and all revenue records pertaining to the above land and also upload the same in the computer data maintained by the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Spl. Government Pleader.