- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 September 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 11857/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
04.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The District Collector, Collectorate, Ramanathapuram.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
04.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN P.Kaveri Mannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Superintendent of Engineer, O/o the Superintendent of Engineer, TANGEDCO, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Electrical Sub Station, Regunathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd Respondent to provide the new electricity service connection to the petitioner house situated in 1/8D, Kutthukkal Valasai Village, Methalodai post, Ramanathapuram District within stipulated time prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.A.S.Alaudeen For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Spl. Government Pleader for R1. Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R2 & R3.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.