VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sethuraman v. The Appellate Tribunal - Cum - the District Collector

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 July 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 19358/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

O R D E R Challenging the order dated 03.12.2021 passed by the second respondent and the consequential order dated 18.11.2021 passed by the first respondent, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Though the names of respondents 4 and 5 are printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.

¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondents 4 and 5, who are the sons of the petitioner, have agreed to comply with the order passed by the second respondent and to pay maintenance to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has agreed to receive a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each per month from the respondents 4 and 5 towards his maintenance.

¶4In view of the aforesaid submission and considering the age of the petitioner, this Court directs the respondents 4 and 5 to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each per month to the petitioner towards his maintenance on or before the 7th day of every English calendar month. In the event of any default in the payment of the monthly maintenance, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the competent authority under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, including by seeking enforcement of the maintenance order, in accordance with law.

¶5With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

20.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To

¶1The Appellate Tribunal - Cum the District Collector, the District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.

¶3The Sub Registrar, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. M.DHANDAPANI

,J.

PKN DATED : 20.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP (MD) Nos.16013 to 16015 of 2023 Sethuraman ... Petitioner(s) vs. 1. The Appellate Tribunal - Cum the District Collector, the District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 3. The Sub Registrar, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. 4. Venkat Prabhu 5.S.Anand ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 03.12.2021 passed by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings Na.Ka.No. 0952/2021/A2 and its consequential order dated 18.11.2022 passed by the 1st respondent in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No. 2014/A3/2021 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents No.1 and 2 herein to cancel the settlement deed executed by the petitioner vide Doc.No. 585 and 586 of 2004 dated 24.02.2004m Doc.No.5136 of 2008 dated 27.02.2008, Doc.No. 3820 of 2017 dated 06.09.2021 and 4161 of 2017 dated 21.09.2017 in favour of the respondent No.4 and 5 by invoking provision under Section 23(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, Counsel for State

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.