VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mr.A. Amar v. The District Collector

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 August 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12000/2015

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He also made an endorsement to this effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

29.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruverambur, Trichy.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruverambur, Trichy.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015

29.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 A.Amar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Trichy. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruverambur, Trichy. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruverambur, Trichy. 4.T.A.Abdul Jaffer 5.R.Nallenthiran (R.4 & R.5 are impleaded vide order of this Court dated 25.10.2017) ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in the impugned resolution in Na.Ka.No.01/03/2015 dated 01.07.2015 passed by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal, subsequently this Court to direct the respondents 1 and 3 to give a protection to the conducting prayer in Permanently in petitioner own land in survey No.37/1A without any disturbance. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.C.Vakeeswaran for R.5 No Appearance for R.4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.