Palanisamy(Died) v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The only request made by the petitioner is that they should not be evicted by the official respondents except by due process of law. No exception can be taken to the said request. The official respondents 1 to 3 are directed to adhere to due process of law. No relief is claimed against the fourth respondent.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

10.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Manapparai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

10.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Palanisamy (died) 2.Nallammal 3.Periammal 4.Shankar 5.Sakthivel (this Court suo motu impleaded the petitioners 2 to 5 vide order dated 10.07.2023) ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Manapparai. 3.The Commissioner, Manapparai Panchayat Union, Manapparai, Tiruchirappali District. 4.The General Manager, GHCL Limited, Kovilpatti Road, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 2 & 3 not to evict the petitioner forcibly from his residence except under due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Madasamy For Respondents : Mr.M.GA.Nataraj Government Advocate for R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sridhar for R4 : no appearance for R3