P.Balakaruppu v. The Chairman

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner challenges the resolution passed by the respondent municipality. It is well settled that as against a mere resolution, writ petition will not lie. If any consequential action is taken, it is of course open to the petitioner to question on all the grounds that has been projected in the writ petition. In this case, the petitioner has come at the agenda stage itself.

3.With this liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

04.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

04.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 P.Balakaruppu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Srivilliputhur Municipality, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Commissioner, Srivilliputhur Municipality, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in respect of the Agenda No.30 in Notice dated 26.03.2015 and quash the same as illegal null and void. For Petitioner : Mrs.P.Malini For Respondents : Mr.J.Parekhkumar, Standing Counsel.