Shanmugavel v. The Regional Manager

ORDER None appears for the petitioners.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the Bank as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader inform the Court that the complaint given by the petitioners was closed. The petitioners have to necessarily move the jurisdictional magistrate Court for relief. Filing the writ petition is misconceived. Leaving open the petitioner's other rights and remedies, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

06.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Muthukulathoor, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

06.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN 1.Shanmugavel 2.Kaliammal 3.Ponnusamy ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Madurai. 2.The Manager, State Bank of India, Muthukulathoor, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Inspector of Police, Muthukulathoor, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to conduct proper investigation on the petitioner's complaint dated 22.11.2013 and subsequent complaint given to the fifth respondent, dated 29.05.2015 with regard to the misappropriated loan collection amount and swindle the entire 2nd loan amount and register the case. For Petitioners : no appearance For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam for R1 & R2 : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader for R3 to R5