K.Gurusamy v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2What is under challenge is only a notice. It is well settled that a mere notice does not infringe the rights of any of the parties.

¶3The petitioner can very well place his objections before the first respondent. Leaving open all the contentions and defences of the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To:

¶1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti – 628 501.

¶2The Tahsildar, Kovilpatti Taluk, Kovilpatti. 3 W.P.(MD)NO.12753 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.12753 of 2015

05.09.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.12753 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.12753 of 2015 AND M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 K.Gurusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti – 628 501. 2. The Tahsildar, Kovilpatti Taluk, Kovilpatti. 3. G.Mariappan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the entire proceedings in A6.2194/2015 dated 24.06.2015 on the file of the first respondent and to quash the same and forbear respondents 1 and 2 from proceeding with the enquiry relating to the issue of patta or modification of patta No.243, pertaining to survey No.224/4 to an extent of 0.19.5 Ares in Puliankulam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin District. For Petitioner : Mrs.Jessi Jeeva Priya For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.N.GA.Natraj, Government Advocate. For R-3 : Mr.Pon.Senthilkumar * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.12753 OF 2015