- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 October 2023
- Bench
- K.Murali Shankar
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 2357/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated
23.12.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.117 of 2019 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Radhapuram, dismissing the petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 C.P.C.
¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has filed the above suit to declare that he is entitled to 2 ½ feet space on the western wall of his house and for mandatory injunction, directing the defendant to remove the structure put up by them abutting north - south western wall of the petitioner/plaintiff's house.
¶3Pending suit, the petitioner/plaintiff has filed the above application, seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit on same cause of action. In the affidavit filed in support of the above application, the petitioner has stated that due to inadvertance some important material facts were not pleaded in the pliant; that the said defects were formal in nature and that therefore, he was constrained to file the above application.
¶4Order 23 Rule 1 (3) C.P.C., contemplates for ' a withdrawal from the suit with liberty to bring a fresh suit and for that, the plaintiff must asks for relief and makes out a case within clause (a) or (b) and that the Court has no jurisdiction to allow such withdrawal with liberty unless the condition in either of the clauses i.e., the existence of a formal defect fatal to the suit is satisfied.
¶5Admittedly, the petitioner has pleaded nothing and he has not even chosen to specify the existence of any formal defect or any other sufficient ground warranting withdrawal of the suit. Since the petitioner's affidavit is bereft of any particulars, the learned trial Judge considering the objections raised by the other side, has rightly dismissed the above petition. Hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the dismissal order passed by the trial Court. Consequently, this Court concludes that the Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed.
¶6Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
05.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No das To
1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Radhapuram.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J. das
05.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2357 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.12067 of 2023 Kitheriyan : Petitioner/Petitioner Plaintiff Vs. Little Marry alias Pitchammal : Respondent/Respondent Defendant PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and executable order, dated 23.12.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.117 of 2019 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Radhapuram. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.