Alagumalayan v. The State Rep.By Through Its

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He also made an endorsement to this effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, Dindigul East, Dindigul District.

4.The Block Development Officer, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District.

5.The President, Vemparpatti Panchayat, Dindigul District.

6.The Village Administrative Officer, Vemparpatti, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

18.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Alagumalayan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State represented by The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Dindigul East, Dindigul District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District. 5.The President, Vemparpatti Panchayat, Dindigul District. 6.The Village Administrative Officer, Vemparpatti, Dindigul District. 7.R.Janarthanan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.06.2015 and directing the respondents 1 to 6 to mutate the pathway situated in the Survey No.267/5 in the Village record, after the complete enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.Vinayaga Moorthy For Respondents : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.6 Mr.N.Subramanian for R.7