VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P. Periyasamy, v. The Inspector General

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 September 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13123/2015

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.The second respondent passed order dated 19.12.2014 invalidating the sale deed executed in favour of the writ petitioner. The order was passed by invoking Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2021. Subsequently, the said circular has been withdrawn. Orders passed thereunder were ordered to be recalled. In these circumstances, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

27.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai – 600 028.

2.The District Registrar (Administration), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

27.09.2023 (1/3)

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 P.Periyasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The District Registrar (Administration), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 4.M.Karuppa Thevar 5.K.Pappathiammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceeding in Na.Ka.No.4890/Aa1/Aa4/2015 dated 19.12.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the 3rd respondent not to transfer the revenue patta No.1638 in Aviyur Village in the petitioner's name. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Spl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3. Mr.S.Parthasarathy for R5. No appearance for R4.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.