- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 132/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
08.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality, Sivagangai District.
2.The Chairman, Karaikudi Municipality, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)Nos.1, 2 & 3 of 2015
08.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)Nos.1, 2 & 3 of 2015 M.Veeraiah ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality, Sivagangai District. 2.The Chairman, Karaikudi Municipality, Sivagangai District. 3.Vijayalakshmi 4.Karpagam Elango ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the Impugned tender notification of the first respondent in Na.Ka. No.2952/2013/E1 dated 26.12.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to issue tender notification in accordance with law by following single cover system. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For Respondents : Mrs.K.Elilselvi for R.1 No Appearance for R.2 to R.4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.