- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13231/2015
Judgment
ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that on the last occasion, the instructing police official identified the petitioner and that the writ petitioner had told him that he is no longer interested in pursuing the matter. The learned Additional Government Pleader had advised the said person to give appropriate instruction to his counsel. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that he is not having instructions in the matter.
¶2Granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition if he is still having subsisting grievance, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
17.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The Secretary, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai.
2.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
3.The Inspector of Police, Ambasamuthiram Police Station, Ambasamuthiram, Tirunelveli District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
17.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 S.Madakannu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 3.The Inspector of Police, Ambasamuthiram Police Station, Ambasamuthiram, Tirunelveli District. 4.K.Ponnusamy 5.Mohan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to initiate appropriate legal proceedings in accordance with law as against the respondents 3, 4 & 5 for their act of in human, illegal and high handed activities and further forbearing the respondents 3, 4 & 5 from harassing the petitioner for their illegal enrichment forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palani Velayutham For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Saravanan for R4 & R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.