- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13430/2015
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has now become infructuous. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication. This writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
10.07.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To: The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3 W.P.(MD)NO.13430 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.13430 of 2015
10.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
1 W.P.(MD)NO.13430 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.13430 of 2015 R.Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on representation dated 04.07.2015 within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muthumalai For Respondent : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Additional Government Pleader. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.13430 OF 2015
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.