K. Govindan, v. The Tahsildar,

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner appears to be aggrieved by the written information said to have been furnished by one Gnanasekaran and Subburaya Takkar. If the petitioner feels aggrieved, he can as well lodge a criminal prosecution against them. The petitioner cannot compel that the Tahsildar, Sivakasi must take action against them.

¶3Granting liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate legal action against the said individuals, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

10.07.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To: The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3 W.P.(MD)NO.13431 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.13431 of 2015

10.07.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.13431 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.13431 of 2015 K.Govindan ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2015 within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muthumalai For Respondent : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Additional Government Pleader. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.13431 OF 2015