- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 September 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13897/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the official respondents. The third respondent has been served but he has not chosen to enter appearance.
2.The petitioner is none other than the sister of the third respondent. The third respondent executed settlement deed in favour of the petitioner on 27.10.2014. This settlement deed was unilaterally cancelled by the third respondent on 02.01.2015. It was also registered by the second respondent. Challenging the same, the present writ petition came to be filed.
3.It has been held in several cases that unilateral cancellation is impermissible in law. In any event, the second respondent could not have registered the same. Registration of the impugned unilateral cancellation deed is set aside. The writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
19.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pathinapakam, Chennai 28.
2.The Sub Registrar II, O/o.the Registrar, Sivagangai II, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
19.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
=-BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 R.Kaliammai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pathinapakam, Chennai 28. 2.The Sub Registrar II, O/o.the Registrar, Sivagangai II, Sivagangai District. 3.Arumugam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the registration of the cancellation of the Settlement Deed executed by the 3rd respondent dated 02.01.2015 registered as Document No.4/2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Ms.Jasima Yasmin, For M/s.Ajmal Associates. For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2. No appearance for R3.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.