VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Virumandi v. Inspector General of

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 September 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 14034/2015

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner wants action to be taken under Circular No.67 dated

03.11.2011. The said circular has subsequently been withdrawn. In fact, the orders passed when the circular was in subsistence were also directed to be recalled.

¶3In these circumstances, this writ petition may not survive. The petitioner is however given liberty to work out his rights before the jurisdictional civil Court. The learned counsel on either side inform that both the parties have moved the jurisdictional civil Court by filing the civil suits. The parties may work out their rights in the said suits.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

25.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.Inspector General of Registration, O/o. The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai-600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Joint Sub-Registrar No.IV, O/o.Joint Sub Registrar No.IV, Madurai South, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

25.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 and W.M.P.(MD)No.13171 of 2017 P.Virumandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Inspector General of Registration, O/o. The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai-600 028. 2.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Joint Sub-Registrar No.IV, O/o.Joint Sub Registrar No.IV, Madurai South, Madurai District. 4.P.Sivanammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in TAVA.MANU.NO.16/2015 dated 22.5.2015 on the file of the Respondent No.3 and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction, directing the Respondent No.1 to 3 conduct a fresh enquiry and consequently cancel the Document registered in document No.4569/2015 registered before the respondent No.2 in accordance with the Circular No.67 dated 3.11.2011 issued by the Respondent No.1 within the time period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Kannan for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.