VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ad Inn Advertising Services v. The Superintendent of Police

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 March 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 14133/2015

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed as against the cancellation of the petitioner's license for maintaining blinker signals at Kodaikanal.

2.The first respondent by his order dated 23.03.2015 has permitted the petitioner to maintain blinker signals at seven places at Kodaikanal for a period of two years and the same was later cancelled by the respondents on 24.07.2015, which is under challenge in this writ petition.

3.Since the license period itself is for a period of two years and subsequently, it was cancelled by the respondents on

24.07.2015, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

27.03.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No vrn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The District Collector, Dindigul District. W.P(MD)No.14133eofe2015 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ vrn Orderomadeoin W.P(MD)oNo.14133oofo2015oand MP(MD)oNos.1o&o2oofo2015

27.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2023 CORAM : THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD) No.14133 of 2015 and MP(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 Ad Inn Advertising Services Pvt ltd, Represented by its Assistant Manager/ Authorised Signatory, Mohankumar Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 3.Vision o India, Harvey Nagar, 3rd Street, Arasaradi, Madurai – 16. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent bearing No.Na.Ka.C2/8051/304/2015, dated 24.07.2015 and quash the same insofar as 9 places mentioned in the first page of the impugned order namely 1)Kodaikanal tollgate 2)Zion School junction 3)Monjikal junction 4)BSNL Office Junction 5)7 Road junction 6) CSI Church junction 7)Astoria Hotel Junction 8) Naidu Puram Kurunjiandavar Kovil Junction 9)Club road junction and forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with the petitioner's rights to display advertisement in the traffic signals and in the timers allotted to the petitioner during the period of allotment as per order of the first respondent dated 23.03.2015. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Anwar Sameem For R1 :Mr.P.Kottaichamy Government Advocate For R2 :Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader For R3 :No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.