VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ramamoorthy v. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented By,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 August 2026
Bench
Mummineni Sudheer Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 22418/2026

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1, 2, 4 and

5.

¶2With consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The petitioner herein was initially appointed as Grade–II Warder in Tamil Nadu Prison Departmen on 24.07.1984. Thereafter, he was upgraded to the post of Grade-I Warder and finally retired from service on 31.03.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner came to know that one Mr.K.Krishnamoorthy, who was promoted to the post of Grade-I Warder much later than the petitioner, has been drawing higher salary at the rate of Rs.11,790/- while the petitioner was drawing Rs.11,510/- due to an error in fixation of pay under 6th Pay Commission and the petitioner claims to have made a claim for upgrading his pay on par with the said Krishnamoorthy. It is further case of the petitioner that the said request made by the petitioner was also considered by the fifth respondent and appropriate proposal to fix the pay of the petitioner has already been submitted to the second respondent vide Letter No.2158/KiSi.2/2021 dated 11.04.2022. The said proposal is still pending for consideration before the second respondent. It is the further case of the petitioner that similarly situated persons were also extended the same benefit as that granted to the said Krishnamoorthy.

¶4In the light of the fact that the said proposal is still pending before the second respondent since 11.04.2022, the petitioner claims to have submitted a representation dated 29.06.2026 requesting for consideration of his case for re-fixation pursuant to the proposal submitted by the fifth respondent dated 11.04.2022. As the respondents have not taken any action on the representation, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

¶5Mr.G.Mohan Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1,2, 4 and 5 fairly submitted that the first respondent will take appropriate decision on the proposal submitted by the fifth respondent expeditiously.

¶6In the light of the above, without going into merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the representation dated 29.06.2026 submitted by the petitioner duly taking into consideration the proposal submitted by the fifth respondent vide Letter No.2158/KiSi.2/2021 dated 11.04.2022 and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

06.08.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No CM TO

¶1State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009.

¶2The Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services, Tamil Nadu Prison Department, No.6, Annai E.V.R.Maniammaiyar Salai, Egmore,Chennai-600 008.

¶3The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu, Office of the Accountant General, 361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

¶4The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services, Trichy Range, Office of DIG Prisons, Opposite to Trichy Central Prison, Trichy – 620 023.

¶5The Superintendent of Prison, Bortstal School and District Jail-Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai-622 001. MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J CM

WP(MD) No.22418 of 2026 Date : 06/08/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06/08/2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Ramamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs 1. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009. 2. The Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services, Tamil Nadu Prison Department, No.6, Annai E.V.R.Maniammaiyar Salai, Egmore,Chennai-600 008. 3. The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu, Office of the Accountant General, 361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services, Trichy Range, Office of DIG Prisons, Opposite to Trichy Central Prison, Trichy – 620 023. 5. The Superintendent of Prison, Bortstal School and District Jail-Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai- 622 001. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.1 to re-fix the Petitioner's scale of pay based on the proposal sent by the fifth respondent in No.2158/KiSi.2/2021 dated 11.04.2022 and pay the resultant arrears arising out of such re-fixation of arrears of salary, pension and other retirement benefits to the Petitioner in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Dr.R.Alagumani For R1,R2,R4 & R5 : Mr.G.Mohan Kumar Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.