D.Pandi Ammal v. The Deputy Commissioner of

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner circulated a letter dated 17.03.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial) for withdrawing the writ petition.

¶2Based on the letter dated 17.03.2023, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

24.03.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Deputy Commissioner of Police, (Law & Order), East Chithirai Street, Madurai – 1.

¶2The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Back side to Pandian Hotel, Madurai – 2.

¶3The Sub Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Back side to Pandian Hotel, Madurai – 2.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

24.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI D.Pandi Ammal ... Petitioner versus 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, (Law & Order), East Chithirai Street, Madurai – 1. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Back side to Pandian Hotel, Madurai – 2. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Back side to Pandian Hotel, Madurai – 2. 4. R.Niranjan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere in Civil dispute and not to do Kattapanchayat in the civil dispute between the petitioner and 4th respondent further not to harass the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.AN.Ramanathan For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R4 : No appearance