T.Vinay Veera Arasu v. The District Collector

ORDER When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on

16.03.2023, 21.03.2023 and on 31.03.2023 there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the case was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal.

2.Accordingly this writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. When the case is taken up for hearing there is no representation for the petitioner.

3.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent submits that criminal case registered against the 2nd respondent ended in acquittal by judgment dated 13.03.2020 in SC.No.65 of 2014 on the file of the Special Court for Trial of Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Tirunelveli.

4.Since there is no representation for the petitioner, despite the case is listed under the caption for dismissal, this writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

12.06.2023 Internet : Yes / No dsk To

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

2.The Special Deputy Collector, Revenue Court, Thanjavur.

3.The Tahsildar / Record Officer, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

12.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 12.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI T.Vinay Veera Arasu ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Panchayat President, Anaikudi Panchayat, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.12.2014 within time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondent : Mr.GV.Vairam Santhosh, No.1 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : No representation No.2