- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5721/2014
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Permission granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
22.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Collector, Madurai District.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Maduri District.
3.The Tahsildhar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
22.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 C.Kosalai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Maduri District. 3.The Tahsildhar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 4.Ganesan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.72732/2010/J1 dated 19.12.2011 on the file of the 2nd respondent and to quash the same as illegal, further direct the respondent to grant implementation of the D NAMUNA in favour of the petitioner vide order No.12537/06/B3 dated 17.10.2006 by putting the petitioner in possession of Survey No.107/2 at Nalluthevanpatti Village, Usilampatti Circle, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.