- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14910/2015
Judgment
ORDER
The petitioner has applied to the jurisdictional authority for conducting survey of the petition mentioned lands and for demarcation of the boundaries. Since the authority had not acted upon the petitioner's request, this writ petition came to be filed.
¶2The Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-
(I) The survey authority will issue notice to the writ petitioner as well as the adjacent land owners and also to the interested persons, if any.
(II) Enquiry shall be held. During enquiry, objections raised by the adjacent land owners / interested persons shall be considered.
(III) If according to the jurisdictional authority, the objections are without any basis, the same shall be overruled and the objectors shall be informed accordingly. But the survey will be conducted only after a period of six weeks so that the objector can move the concerned Court for injunction. If before the proposed date of survey, the objector is unable to obtain any injunction order, the survey can very well go on.
(IV) If the jurisdictional authority finds objections to be having substance, then, he shall call upon the applicant to move the jurisdictional civil Court for agitating his rights.
(V) If required, the survey authority is empowered to seek aid of the jurisdictional police and the jurisdictional police are mandated to grant police protection.
(VI) It is made clear that at the end of the survey exercise, survey stones alone can be installed. The exercise of survey and demarcation undertaken pursuant to the direction of this Court can never result in dispossession of any party. No person shall put up fencing at the time of survey by using police aid.
(VII) A copy of the survey report will be served on the parties also. No costs.
11.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Collector, Dindigul.
2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.
3.The Surveyor,, Dindigul East Tahsildar Office, Dindigul.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
11.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.V.Murugesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul. 2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul. 3.Joseph Anthony Samy, Taluk Surveyor, Dindigul East Tahsildar Office, Dindigul. 4.Surveyor,, Dindigul East Tahsildar Office, Dindigul. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to order for surveying the land of the petitioner under S.No.162/2B, under Patta No.1020, measuring 0.31.00 Aries, at Anjukulipatti Village, Dindigul District as per the FMB Sketch of the Village by engaging a surveyor other than the 3rd respondent herein. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1, R2 & R4.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.