VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Irudhayasamy v. The District Collector

PARTLY ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2026
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor, R. Poornima
Case no.
WP(MD) 20974/2019

Judgment

O R D E R (Order of the Court was delivered by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) The petitioner is holding the petition-mentioned land under a deed of grant dated 29.09.1969 issued by the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Board. The petitioner contends that the land has been assessed to tax and that it is under cultivation and that he has not breached the conditions of grant. The petitioner has been calling upon the jurisdictional Tahsildar to issue patta. The petitioner's request has not been considered till date. The petitioner's counsel states that on account of non-registration of the deed of grant, the Tahsildar, Thanjavur is declining to consider the said representation.

¶2Section 17 of the Registration Act mandates that instruments of gift of immovable property and other non-testamentary instruments that purport or operate to create any right, title or interest in immovable property will have to be compulsorily registered. But Section 24 of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958 reads as follows:- " 24. Exemption from registration and 3 W.P.(MD)NO.20974 OF 2019 stamp duty. --Notwith. standing anything contained in any other law, every declaration and every grant of land mado or deomed to have been made undor this Act shall be and be doemed niways to have been exemptfrom regiatration and paymont of stamp duty and of enoumbrance certificate fee." Entry 6 of the Concurrent list deals with registration of deeds and documents. Article 254(2) of the Constitution of India states that where a law made by a State Legislature with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List contains any provision repugnant to the provision of an earlier law made by Parliament or an existing law with respect to that matter, then the law made by the State Legislature shall, if it has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent, prevail in that State. It is relevant to note that the Bhoodan Act had also received the presidential assent. Hence, Section 24 of the Bhoodan Act though repugnant to Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 will prevail over the same. Section 24 of the Bhoodan Act opens with an overriding clause. Hence, a deed of grant issued by the Bhoodan Yagna Board does not require registration. The jurisdictional Tahsildar will have to consider the request of the writ petitioner for 4 W.P.(MD)NO.20974 OF 2019 issuance of patta on merits. The fact that the deed of grant had not been registered is immaterial.

¶3We permit the petitioner to submit a fresh representation / application for issuance of patta. The second respondent shall consider and dispose it of on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

(G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (R.POORNIMA, J.) 23rd March 2026

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To:

¶1The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Court Road, Thanjavur.

¶2The Revenue Inspector, Nanjikkottai, Thanjavur Taluk. 5 W.P.(MD)NO.20974 OF 2019

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND

R.POORNIMA, J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.20974 of 2019

23.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.20974 OF 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA W.P.(MD)No.20974 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17574 & 23598 of 2019 Irudhayasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Trichy Road, Thanjavur. 2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Court Road, Thanjavur. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant patta in the name of the petitioner for S.No. 326/2-0.40.5 Hectares of Nanjikkottai Village, Thanjavur Taluk and District covered by the grand deed dated 29.09.1969 in favour of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vadivel For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.20974 OF 2019

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.