- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15198/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition.
¶2In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
11.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli Collectorate Office, Tirunelveli.
3.The Tahsildar, Tirunelveli Taluk,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
11.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 R.Puvazendran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli Collectorate Office, Tirunelveli. 3.The Tahsildar, Tirunelveli Taluk, 4.Kandasamy ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.07.2015 sent by the petitioner requesting the respondents 1 to 3 herein to take appropriate action against the 4th respondent herein and his family members for claiming themselves they have given free house site allotted to them though obtained false representation and trying to illegal right claim over the petitioners patta land Situated at No. 178/8, K.K.Nagar, Gangaikondan, For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sundarapandian For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.