M.Anbarasan, v. The Tahsildar,

ORDER None appears for the petitioner.

2.The names of the respondents 3 and 4 have been added as joint pattadars. The respondents 3 and 4 had purchased shares from the second respondent. The purchasers are definitely entitled to be added as joint pattadars.

3.It is also stated that the petitioner has subsequently filed a partition suit in O.S.No.144 of 2015 on the file of District Munsif Court, Madurai Taluk. The rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the partition suit proceedings. The petitioner has also not challenged any order as such. A Writ of Certiorari will not lie against mere computerized patta.

4.Granting liberty to the petitioner to workout his rights in the pending partition suit, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

11.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The Tahsildar, Maduai East, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

11.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 M.Anbarasan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Maduai East, Madurai. 2.K.Lakshmi 3.K.Bharathidhasan 4.K.Prabhu 5.M.Muthumanickam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned patta No.55, S.No.11/2 - an extent of 0.06.0 ares situated at Sithakkoor Village No.114, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District issued by the 1st respondent dated 27.05.2015 in favour of the respondents 2 to 4 and quash the same and directing the 1st respondent to issue patta in its original name which is earlier to the present impugned patta within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, Addl. Government Pleader for R1. Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan for R3 & R4.