E. Pal v. The Superintending Engineer

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The prayer in this writ petition is for forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from providing electricity service connection to the well in the petition mentioned survey number. During the pendency of the writ petition, connection has already been provided. Nothing survives for further adjudication. Liberty is given to the petitioner to question the grant of service connection.

¶3This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

27.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

27.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN E.Pal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 3.Chellappa ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 not to provide electricity connection to the well and land comprised in Survey No. 70/17, Melkarai village, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District in favour of third respondent by considering petitioner's representation dated 22.08.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mr.S.Dheenadhayalan Standing Counsel for R.1 & R.2 Mr.D.Nallathambi for R.3