- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15574/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the registering authority /R1. The second respondent is no more. His legal heirs have been served and their names are printed in the cause list. But they have not chosen to enter appearance.
¶2The second respondent executed a sale deed dated
24.05.1995 (Document No.713/1995) in favour of the petitioner. On 08.09.1995, the sale deed was unilaterally cancelled. The petitioner states that he was unaware of the execution of the deed of cancellation. Even before the cancellation deed was registered, the petitioner had already made alienations. Only from the one of the purchasers, the petitioner came to know in the year 2015 about the registration of the cancellation deed. Thereupon, the present writ petition came to be filed.
¶3The issue raised in the writ petition is no longer res integra. It is covered by the decisions of the Full Bench of this Court (2011
(2) CTC 1 (Latif Estate Line India Ltd Vs. Hadeeja Ammal) & 2022
(5) CTC 257 (Sasikala Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer).
¶4Respectfully applying the ratio laid down above, the impugned registration of the deed of cancellation dated 08.09.1995 is set aside. The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Sub Registrar, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
02.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 K.Arunkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Sub Registrar, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District. 2.K.S.G.Vergis (died) 3.Ponnamma G Vergis 4.Ain Vergis (Respondents 3 & 4 are impleaded by this Court vide order dated 02.08.2023 in W.M.P.(MD)No.9570 of 2017) ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent registering the impugned cancellation deed of sale in Document No. 1225/95 dated 08.09.1995 executed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to remove the entry made regarding Document No. 1225/95 dated 08.09.1995 in Book.No.1 of his office. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader for R1 : no appearance for R3 & R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.