- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15610/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the matter has become infructuous. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
11.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015
11.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 Panuvel Nadar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 2.J.Rejikumar ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the first respondent in E2/024772/15 dated 24.08.2015 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Nataraj Government Advocate for R.1 Mr.C.Muthu Saravanan for R.2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.