- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16271/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. No costs.
12.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The Assistant Director (Town Panchayat), Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli.
2.The Executive Officer/ Public Information Officer, Panagudi Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Tirunelveli District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
12.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Karthikeyan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Director (Town Panchayat), Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli. 2.The Executive Officer/ Public Information Officer, Panagudi Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Tirunelveli District. 3.Raja Nambi Krishnan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to furnish the particulars based on the petitioner's application dated 14.08.2013 within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Pon Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2. No appearance for R3.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.