VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V. Paulraj v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 July 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7607/2014

Judgment

ORDER None appears for the writ petitioner.

¶2The prayer is for directing the third respondent to consider the objection lodged by the petitioner through his counsel and for restraining the contesting private respondents from dealing with the petition mentioned land.

¶3The first part of the prayer cannot be granted. The Sub Registrar is exercising statutory functions. The writ Court cannot restrain the statutory authority from discharging his statutory functions. The petitioner has private dispute with the fifth respondent herein. The petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional civil Court for resolving his disputes. The process cannot be short-circuited by invoking writ jurisdiction.

¶4Leaving open all the rights and remedies of the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sayalkudi, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Vilathikulam, Tuticorin District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014

03.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 V.Paulraj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sayalkudi, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Vilathikulam, Tuticorin District. 5.Deva Arockiyam ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner's counsel dated 25.02.2014 and also direct the third respondent not to register any document executed by the fifth respondent or any other person, relating to Survey No. 296/4A1A, Narikudi Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arivalagan For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.4 No Appearance for R.5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.