V.R.Sathishkumar v. The Inspector General of

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner submitted representation dated 01.08.2015 before the second respondent for annulling the registration of the document executed by the fourth respondent in favour of the fifth respondent. The case of the petitioner is that in violation of an attachment order passed by the competent Court, the execution and registration were carried out.

¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the private respondents submitted that the petitioner's representation was enquired into and it was closed.

¶4Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the private respondents (4 and 5), this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Door No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinampakkam, Chennai – 28.

2.The District Registrar (Administration), Registration Office, Rajakambeeram, Madurai.

3.The Sub Registrar, Othakkadai, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

18.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN V.R.Sathishkumar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Door No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinampakkam, Chennai – 28. 2.The District Registrar (Administration), Registration Office, Rajakambeeram, Madurai. 3.The Sub Registrar, Othakkadai, Madurai. 4.Utchiammal 5.Sumathi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.08.2015 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court and thereby conduct an enquiry in the manner known to law after providing opportunity to the respondents 4 and 5 and thereby cancel the sale deed bearing Document No. 1586/2015 dated 10.04.2015 executed by the fourth respondent in favour of the fifth respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj for Mr.M.Kaliraj For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.S.Jayakumar for R.4 & R.5