Thandeeswaran v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and going through the materials on record, I am more than satisfied that a private dispute is sought to be resolved through public law remedy. The petitioner's case is that the private respondents herein are dealing with his patta land. If that be so, the petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional civil Court for appropriate relief.

¶3Granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

18.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Thandeeswaran ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.Pasukara Goundar 4.Arumugam 5.Ramasamy 6.K.S.P.Sethu 7.Raja ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the respondents 3 to 7 for their illegal activities in accordance with law based on the petitioner's complaint dated 20.08.2015 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ajmal Khan For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R.1 & R.2 Mr.S.Vellaichamy for R.3 to R.7