A.Ayyavu v. The District Registrar,

ORDER None appears for the petitioner.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent states that the petitioner is no more. What is under challenge is a mere notice issued under Section 83 of the Registration Act. It does not by itself affect the rights of any of the parties. It is open to the first respondent to issue fresh notice to the concerned parties if law permits.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

24.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The District Registrar (Admin), Madurai North Registration District, Combined Complex of Registration Department, TNAU Nagar, Othakadai Post, Rajagambiram, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

24.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 A.Ayyavu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Admin), Madurai North Registration District, Combined Complex of Registration Department, TNAU Nagar, Othakadai Post, Rajagambiram, Madurai District. 2.V.Pandiarajan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records pertaining to the proceedings of the 1st respondent vide Na.Ka. No. 2627/Aa1/2015 dated 03.08.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner : no appearance For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 : Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran for R2