George v. The Commissioner of Police

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infrucutuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.

2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petition is closed.

24.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Teppakulam Police Station, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

24.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 George ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Teppakulam Police Station, Madurai. 3.G.Murugesa Pandian 4.M.Rajam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4 pertaining to the property measuring 10 cents of land in Resurvey No.90/1A and 90/1B, Anuppandy Village, Madurai District being two plots bearing numbers 7C and 19 or pertaining to any money claim. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Nataraj, Government Advocate for R1 & R2. Mr.R.Sevugaraj for R3 & R4.