- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16767/2015
Judgment
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated
16.08.2015. W.P(MD)No.16767 of 2015
2.Today(06.11.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
06.11.2023 Index:Yes Internet:Yes vrn To The Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Chennai – 108. W.P(MD)No.16767 of 2015 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. vrn Orderomadeoin W.P(MD)No.16767oofo2015oand MP(MD)oNo.1oofo2015
06.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
W.P(MD)No.16767 of 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.16767 of 2015 and MP(MD) No.1 of 2015 N.Vijayakumari ... Petitioner Vs The Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Chennai – 108. ...Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 16.08.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kmar For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.